The gap that entity
lists cannot close.
A documented case of how military end-use was concealed across languages, missed by standard screening, and only surfaced after a Freedom of Information request.
Imperial & JARI: the translation gap.
Imperial College London characterized its partnership with Jiangsu Automation Research Institute (JARI) as civilian ocean modeling. A 2018 Chinese-language email from JARI's head of research, surfaced only via Freedom of Information, explicitly requested help developing data-visualization tools for "smart military base(s)."
The military end-use appeared nowhere in the English-language documents provided to Imperial. The partner was known. The affiliation was disclosed. The gap was in what the English-language record said versus what the full record showed.
Case documented in RAND's March 2026 research security framework paper.
Behavior and disclosures, not lists.
Standard screening tools answer one question: is this person or institution on a list? Imperial would have passed. JARI had a known profile. Nothing in the English-language record triggered a flag.
Altare looks at what the full record shows across languages, across publications, and across what was declared. Inconsistencies between those sources are the signal. That gap is invisible to tools that only check lists.
This is the behavioral gray zone. It is where documented incidents actually live, and it is the territory Altare is built to cover.
Want the full methodology study?
Our full study covers documented cases, behavioral patterns, and how the analysis is calibrated. Available on request.